May 27, 2016 at 4:28 pm #236144
Just aquired this on trade and was trying to get info about it because I did not receive any with it.any help appreciated.
nezohc 2016-05-27 16:33:41May 27, 2016 at 4:35 pm #268278
I’m sure this isn’t the kind of help you were hoping for, but NICE CAR!
Welcome to our group!
I’m know SOMEONE will be able to provide you with the help you REALLY were looking for!:lol:
Glad you’re here!
Amor Conquista TodoMay 27, 2016 at 4:39 pm #268279
Thank you .it’s mainly info about the manufacturer.May 27, 2016 at 6:09 pm #268280
Try the “Reference Library” link in the bottom green (topaz?) box to the left. there is a lot of manufacturer info in that area. You may have to look around to find info that applies to your particular car.
Welcome to this site and enjoy!May 27, 2016 at 9:00 pm #268281
Finally! A GREEN one!Car looks good. The fuel tank/spare tire carrier look legit. So too the removable side covers on the engine.
PMOSSBERG2016-05-28 10:37:13May 28, 2016 at 11:04 am #268282
A read through the manufacturer comparison thread is also a great education. There is a post on the Daytona
Former Owner of a 1981 Classic Roadsters Ltd. Duchess (VW)
2005 Intermeccanica Roadster
If you own a TDr and are not in the Registry, please go to http://tdreplica.com/forums/topic/mg-td-replica-registry/ and register (you need to copy and paste the link)May 31, 2016 at 9:53 am #268283
Thanks for the help guys I’m still working out the little problems with it but soild so far.I mainly keep finding vw based ones in this brand I’m struggling to find info on the chevette based model.nezohc2016-05-31 10:04:27June 1, 2016 at 8:40 pm #268284
Not sure that is a Chevette Engine. Mine is “painfully” 1980’s stock and it looks significantly different.The Pontiac T1600 (I think that is what it was called) was another variation of the GM Engine used in BCW Model 52’s – which I think were 99.9% identical to the Chevy Engine.Were Ford engines used in MiGi’s too?Tom
BCW Model 52
South Orange NJJune 1, 2016 at 11:46 pm #268285
Yes. Ford Pinto and Mustang II 2000 and 2300cc engines were commonly used for kits. Parts for the Ford engines are MUCH easier to find than the Chevy.
Early FF TDr on 69 VW pan
Slowly coming back from the ashes...June 3, 2016 at 11:46 am #268286
From everything I have researched its a 1.6 chevette motor missing all of the electrical components for the fuel adjustment solenoid on the carb .so it’s running open loop from my understanding of it so far.but I maybe wrong the guy said chevette he didn’t know which year they used tho he guessed 84 because the titleJune 3, 2016 at 3:19 pm #268287
nezohc email Rich Drake he handles all kinds of Chevette email@example.comHe can help with questions about the Chevette motor
http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=7f9174ad614e43b680deba085b0abf48June 3, 2016 at 8:44 pm #268288
The ’80’s were a terrible time for engines. They typically had 3 miles of vacuum hoses with dozens of time delay vacuum check valves, solenoids, and relays all in an attempt to meet federal emission regulations. If your engine is missing all this stuff, I can only think that is a good thing.
Modified 5.0, 5sp., 4:11
Autocross & Hillclimb
"Drive Happy"June 4, 2016 at 2:26 pm #268289
I double checked – it is a Chevette engine, BUT without alot of the pollution control crap that mine still has. Funny thing is that yours does have a shroud over the pulley system (mine does not) so that you won’t catch your necktie whilst working on the beast!If you don’t have the air-pump and set-up of a line to the cat, your front belt system is a bit shorter than the stock confirguration too.One of these days I’m going to pull all the emissions stuff off of mine too.Tom
BCW Model 52
South Orange NJJune 7, 2016 at 11:31 am #268290
I’ve been reading his forum he made for chevettes.I’m the type to read and research before I post about stuff.but if you do remove all of that stuff go with a 32/36 weber.that’s what I about to switch to.I’ve been having problems with hot starts and the smoothness of acceleration.fine art low throttle and at wot but it because the second barrel doesn’t like to open till wot because the removal of everything but then again I didn’t get to drive it when it was on it either.but motor has 6,xxx miles since rebuild and is been extremely reliable so far I daily drive the car I’ve put about 35 bucks in so far (5 at a time)and have went 637 miles.thanks for the help so far guys.I’ll post more pictures after its bath.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.