<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG TD Replica Car Club | Kent Carls&#111;n | Activity</title>
	<link>https://tdreplica.com/members/kent-carlson/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://tdreplica.com/members/kent-carlson/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Kent Carls&#111;n.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 04:12:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">171f54c5745e17722e895aa307a1ac53</guid>
				<title>Kent Carls&#111;n replied to the topic Fr&#111;nt engine Opti&#111;ns in the forum Chevy/Ford Kits</title>
				<link>https://tdreplica.com/forums/topic/frnt-engine-optins/#post-237227</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:14:20 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keith &#8211; Thanks for that information, that sounds like the way to go.  Does the ranger automatic fit into the kit in a similar fashion to the old Pinto automatic?  I can make up a new floor pan, but just wonder if that is necessary.  Is the ranger rear end too wide?  Following up on your info, I find that the Ranger used the 2.3 until 1997, the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14673"><a href="https://tdreplica.com/forums/topic/frnt-engine-optins/#post-237227" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>